In October 2001 gave Dish Network and Direct TV a very serious attempt at joining forces with one another, could these two satellite TV providers a large monopoly in the satellite TV industry, but the U.S. Department of Justice took one bold stance and blocked the merger.
If the merger between Dish Network and Direct TV would have cost space, the new entity would serve the entire United States without fear of any competition, resulting ina complete monopoly position that is not allowed. As we all know, competition spurs competitive pricing and continuous progress and a merger of this magnitude would result in substantially less progress and the possibility of inflated prices.
At this time, Dish Network and Direct TV are the only two satellite-TV provider in America, a merger between the two this would be a company that is clearly a dangerous reduce monopoly for consumers in their hands. Evenin areas with cable TV the merger would be to only 2 television providers, each of which own a monopoly on its technology.
In their application, Dish Network and Direct TV was that their forces had membership required to compete against the cable TV giants. However, at the time of said application specified statistics, satellite TV grew at an incredibly fast pace, while cable TV subscriptions have been on the decline.
Above it allseemed that no other satellite TV providers, a merger between Dish Network and Direct TV will not be in the best interest of the public.
The fact that there are two satellite TV providers and not just one is a blessing for all in signing up for satellite TV service are interested, as already mentioned, competition is good for the price.
Dish Network and Direct TV are now head to each other in a very aggressive marketing campaign and headprosper as a result of consumer surplus to very nice, by the advantage of the phenomenal deals being offered by one of the two satellite TV giants.
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น